After the election of President Donald Trump, the lame-duck administration, democratic committee, losing candidate Clinton, and mainstream networks told the nation the Russia had interfered with the election, and that Donald Trump was an illegitimate president.
Unlike Clinton’s statements that “17 intelligence agencies” had “concluded that these espionage attacks” were “from the highest levels of the Kremlin,” it was just the CIA, FBI, and NSA that had investigated these claims. It was concluded that the CIA and FBI had a “high confidence” with their assessments, while the NSA had “moderate confidence.”
Their statements were as follows:”We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”
The intelligence report contains no direct evidence of these claims. Along with this, they claim that factually true information from DNC and Podesta emails, which gave American’s a more clear view of candidates, was evidence of interference.
The intelligence agencies did not conclude with any assessment on any other type of interference from Hillary Clinton or the Obama administrations side. However, with the same outlook that the CIA, FBI, and NSA took on Russia, it appears as though the Obama administration did interfere with the election.
Spying on President Donald Trump
Back in November, a day before the election, Louise Mensch from HeatStreet uncovered that “the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.”
Mensch also added that the original request had been denied in June 2016, yet the second request “was granted in October after evidence was presented of a server, possibly related to the Trump campaign, and its alleged links to two banks; SVB Bank and Russia’s Alfa Bank.”
Discussing General Flynn’s wiretap, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the chairman of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was asked “not only an unmasking took place but also an intelligence leak. And as I understand it never happens in a case where signature intelligence such as this is in fact obtained. Is that correct?” by Sean Hannity. Nunes responded, “I’ve never heard of that happening before and as I’ve said many times the only crime that has been committed here is that one and it’s quite clear that it was a crime.”
Just this week, a day after April Fools, Susan Rice had a rude awakening that wasn’t a prank. Mike Cernovich was first to report that Susan Rice, “the National Security Adviser under President Obama, has been identified as the official who requested unmasking of incoming Trump officials.” The “unmasking” process refers to unveiling the identity of American’s in intelligence reports, which is very rare.
Devin Nunes told reporters that the information collected by agencies “was essentially a lot of information on the President-elect and his transition team and what they were doing.”
In addition, the New York Times wrote that “the Obama White House was concerned during the election about continuing attempts by the Russian government to hack Democratic email accounts and interfere in the campaign. Ms. Rice, they said, needed to understand if Americans were involved in that.” Showing that the administration targeted Donald Trump for political reasons surrounding the election.
Nevertheless, Rice claimed that “in order to understand the importance of the report and assess its significance, it was necessary to find out, or request the information.” Amidst the “Russian-hacking” narrative, there were”no references whatsoever in everything that I read, and it was dozens… dozens of reports, and there was no mention of Russia.” When asked about the collection of information, Nunes made clear that he was actually “alarmed by it.”
Simply unmasking a name isn’t the issue. The conflict is that Rice targeted the Trump administration directly for political purposes, yet, it is reported widely by mainstream news that it was Putin who hacked the election.
Cheating Bernie Sanders
When WikiLeaks released hundreds of emails from the DNC, it was shown that the committee had a strong bias against Bernie Sanders. The committee is not suppose to favor any one candidate during the primary, however, Sanders had all ammo used against him.
One email in particular said “we want [Bernie supporters] to go home happy and enthusiastic in working their asses off for Hillary. Why not throw Bernie a bone . . . his people will think they’ve ‘won’ something from the Party Establishment.” In addition, they added “we are going to need [Sander’s] voters to turn out in November for HRC, he won’t be nominated.” The DNC then told each other to “Crush [Bernie] as hard as you can.” Then when they thought of Sanders becoming president was brought it, they stated “this is a silly story. He isn’t going to be president.”
In addition to Donna Brazile feeding Clinton questions to use against Sanders, the behind the scenes also proves to be heavy against Sanders, and granting Clinton a free pass.
Donna Brazile Giving Clinton Debate Questions
During the historic 2016 election, the head of the Democratic National Committee, Donna Brazile communicated with CNN about debate questions. In a WikiLeaks email, Brazile is seen emailing Roland Martin about questions Hillary Clinton will answer in a town hall. In the town hall layout, random audience members are selected to ask the candidate questions. In addition, in any debate format, no candidate ever knows the questions to be asked – such would be defeating the purpose of a debate.
In a separate email, Brazile is then seen emailing the Clinton campaign about questions she will be asked in order to prepare her for the event. This is violation of the rules in a debate. Brazile denied the accusations for months, and lied about the incident.
In an interview Brazile made it clear, “No. I’ve never received questions from CNN. I’ve made that very clear, I’ve made that very plain.” Finally, months after the election, Brazile admitted “I did in my role as a Democratic operative and D.N.C. Vice Chair prior to assuming the interim D.N.C. Chair position was to share potential town hall topics with the Clinton campaign…. But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret.”
Saudi Arabia Funding 20% of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
Since the intelligence assessment states that “Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump,” they must have also concluded that Saudi Arabia had a clear preference for Hillary Clinton, yet, they did not.
Saudi Arabia’s clear preference doesn’t come from inferences, assessments, conclusions, or any other subjective claims. It wasn’t from “judgments” about the “behavior of political figures” either. It comes through a 40 million dollar check.
The Middle East Eye stated in June 2016 that “a report appeared on the Petra News Agency website that included what were described as exclusive comments from Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.” MEE then added that there was a claim that “Riyadh has provided 20 percent of the total funding to the prospective Democratic candidate’s campaign.”
“’Saudi Arabia always has sponsored both Republican and Democratic Party of America and in America current election also provide with full enthusiasm 20 percent of the cost of Hillary Clinton’s election even though some events in the country don’t have a positive look to support the king of a woman (sic) for presidency,’ the report quoted Prince Mohammed as having said.”
The Clintons even admitted that Saudi Arabia and Qatar “are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.” in a WikiLeaks email.
Back in 2008, Fox also reported that The Clinton Foundation “raised at least $46 million from Saudi Arabia and other foreign governments that his wife Hillary Rodham Clinton may end up negotiating with as the next secretary of state.”
Qatar $1 Million Donation
Reuters’ Jonathan Allen reported right before the election that “the Clinton Foundation has confirmed it accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar while Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of state without informing the State Department, even though she had promised to let the agency review new or significantly increased support from foreign governments.” It was stated that the donation was “to mark the 65th birthday of Bill Clinton.”
Once again, showing that Hillary Clinton accepted money from foreign countries, while she was planning to run for president. Accepting random gifts from countries does not come without consequences.
Nevertheless, the intelligence community, unsurprisingly, had nothing to say about this matter.
$12 Million Bribery from King of Morocco
Through a WikiLeaks email, it was revealed that “the King has personally committed approx $12 million” after “the Moroccans agreed to host [a] meeting.” 6 months after the exchange, the US State Department “approved a possible sale of TOW 2A, radio frequency (RF) missiles, and M220A2 TOW launchers to Morocco.”
Clinton staffers expressed their concerns stating, “She created this mess and she knows it.”
Paying People to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies
Any spark of conflicts at Trump rallies were sprayed all over mainstream media. Since President Trump was classified as a racist, sexist, and violent fear-mongerer, the media used conflicts at his rallies to back these claims up. However, WikiLeaks and Project Veritas have shown that it wasn’t Trump supporters being overly violent, but protesters that incited violence against them.
In one instance, President Trump had his fully rally shut down due to violence.
In a WikiLeaks email, staffers talked about how “DREAMers have been bird dogging Republican presidential candidates on DACA/DAPA, but they’ve learned to respond. There’s an opportunity to bird dog and record questions about Trump’s comments and connect it to the policy.”
Being interviewed undercover by Project Veritas, it was revealed that Robert Creamer and Scott Foval they could get Trump supporters to “pop off” by inciting them. They added, “it’s a matter of showing up, to want to get into the rally, in a Planned Parenthood t-shirt. Or, Trump is a Nazi, you know? You can message to draw them out, and draw them to punch you.”
“It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherfucker,” exclaimed Foval.
Some of these same figures were later arrested after planning to gas Trump supporters at a ball.
In the same video, Zulema Rodriguez claimed to be responsible for shutting down the Chicago Trump rally, which turned violent against supporters and police. However, FEC records note that Rodriguez was paid $1,610.34 by the Clinton Campaign. The campaign also gifted her $30.00, which was described as “phone” payment.
It is also noted that under 18 U.S. Code § 2102, it is stated that inciting a riot is illegal.
DNC Giving Questions to CNN
In a DNC email published by WikiLeaks, CNN is caught asking many DNC workers for hard hitting questions to ask Trump and Cruz. The email reads: “CNN is looking for questions. Please send some topical/interesting ones. Maybe a couple on Fiorina. Someone please take point and send them all together by 3pm.”
CNN takes the persona of a neutral news organization, however, this incident proves otherwise. Also shows the Democratic National Committee working together with CNN to get the hardest hitting questions against Hillary Clinton’s opponents.
Obama Guantanamo Jailbreak
In August of 2016, Reuters reported that “15 inmates from the Guantanamo prison were transferred to the United Arab Emirates, the single largest transfer of Guantanamo detainees during President Barack Obama’s administration.”
Then after Trump was the victor and declared president-elect, President Obama made some last second moves as the lame-duck. Reuters reported that “President Barack Obama plans to transfer as many as 18 more prisoners from the Guantanamo Bay military prison before leaving office.”
President Trump responded to Barack Obama urging him to stop by saying “There should be no further releases from Gitmo. These are extremely dangerous people and should not be allowed back onto the battlefield.” These last second moves by a lame-duck president are nothing short of dangerous and irresponsible, since a new president would be assuming office in the immediate days after the decision. It is the role and duty of the president to not make any notable changes or moves that will hurt, or sabotage the upcoming president.
In a Summary of the Reengagement of Detainees Formerly Held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, submitted by the Director of National Intelligence, 30% of the released suspects were confirmed or suspected to have returned to combat. 122 of 693 (17.6%) were “confirmed of reengaging,” while 86 of 693 (12.4%) were “suspected of reengaging.”
Obama Transfer $221 Million to Palestine
Just as President Obama was finishing his tenure AP reported that “the Obama administration in its waning hours defied Republican opposition and quietly released $221 million to the Palestinian Authority that GOP members of Congress had been blocking.”
Pew Research notes that “76% of Palestinians consider the U.S. an enemy, the highest percentage among the nations surveyed.” In addition, Palestinian territory is home to Hamas, which has committed “large-scale bombings against Israeli civilian targets, small-arms attacks, improvised roadside explosives, and rocket attacks,” according to the National Counterterrorism Center.
This transfer of millions of dollars was a sabotage against the next president of the United States: Donald Trump. After being caught by the new president right away, The Times of Israel reported that the “Trump administration has informed the Palestinian Authority that it is freezing the transfer of $221 million.”
Obama Passing Propaganda Act
At the end of 2016, President Obama signed the “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act” into law, when no one was watching.
The act establishes the Global Engagement Center for “to lead, synchronize, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining United States national security interests.”
The act creates a modern day “Ministry of Truth” out of George Orwell’s 1984, where truth is written by the government for the public to follow blindly. In the novel, 2+2 is made to equal 5, simply because the center has the power to do so.
The act was signed in during Christmas, which is when the public is least concerned with politics, laws, or acts being passed. Administrations and congress can get by with much more during this period, and the Obama administration got away with establishing a dystopian government.